Showing posts with label youth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label youth. Show all posts

Friday, March 4, 2011

Assignment 2 – Social media = + or -

Article: How Social Media is Having a Positive Impact On Our Culture


Much has been said about the impact the virtual world has on our ‘real’ world. Quite often the use of smart phones and the internet is seen as a way for many to become distant from the people and the things around them in their physical world. In this article Josh Rose looks at the paradox that the use of social media has created. In some ways it allows us to have a closeness and a connection with people because the technology allows us to do so – texting our family members, sharing pictures on Facebook, tweeting our latest what are we doing facts. In the same breath people attribute a sense of coldness, and lack of a real connection through the use of social media. Yes they may stay in touch more often, but perhaps the quality and the emotional attachment of staying in touch is lost when done through technology versus in person. The article notes that perhaps there is a way of categorizing the outlook we have on the effect of social media – we either think it’s good, bad or normal.


Perhaps a key component of how we see the effect is how we use social media and if we use social media. Talk to the generations that have never lived without it and they will see that it is as natural to text someone as it is to call them or talk to them in person. Palfrey and Gasser assign three characteristics to these Digital Natives: born after 1980, have access to networked digital technologies and the skill set to use them (2008, p. 1). These children are identified both by their real time identity and the one they create online, both existing synchronously. They are bonded together by “the amount of time they spend using digital technologies, their tendency to multitask, their tendency to express themselves and relate to one another in ways mediated by digital technologies, and their pattern of using the technologies to access and use information and create new knowledge and art forms” (2008, page 4). To these people, the effects of social media are definitely a plus versus a negative.


Perhaps the most positive aspect of social media is the ability it allows for people to come together and create. Traditional barriers to working together as a group are taken away through the use of technology. In Clay Shirky’s Here Comes Everybody (2008), he highlights the case that most barriers to group action have been eliminated, and without these barriers there exists an ability to find new ways of gathering together and getting things done Groups that before were dispersed and difficult to bring together are now benefiting from the social tools that exist online.


Rhiengold takes this one step further showing that now that the barriers are removed, the group action can lead to a population in which people wear the title of creator and consumer. With these titles, “they are far more likely to generate freedom and wealth for more people than one in which a small portion of the population produces culture that the majority passively consume”


Sources

Gasser, U., & Palfrey, J. Born Digital. New York. Basic Books.


Rose, J. (2011, February 24). How Social Media is Having a Positive Impact On Our Culture. Retrieved from http://mashable.com/2011/02/23/social-media-culture/


Rheingold, H. (2002). Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution. Massachusetts: Perseus Books.


Shirky, C. (2008). Here Comes Everybody: New York. Penguin Press.

Assignment 2 - Youth are the innovation engine


     Today’s youth work to create opportunity, solutions and partnerships through the digital tools that are so ubiquitous in their lives. Whether through their schools, communities they live in or communities that they travel to, Martinez outlines the many ways in which youth are active rather than passive participants in the issues that they are exposed to. Political campaigns, high school networks, climate solutions road tours are some of the ways in which youth are using “new tools to harness collective knowledge and action” (Martinez, 2009).


     Perhaps this is no great feat because the human ability to collaborate has been an innate part of our history since the beginning of time. The difference now, that Martinez mentions is that the tools and technologies of today - email, smart phones, social networking sites, allow for opportunities of mass collaboration which have never before been available. One example of this is the Indian Youth Climate Network. Through the use of YouTube, their climate solutions road tour findings were shared with users throughout the world, who then have an opportunity to learn, share and do more.

     Without the use of technology the sharing of this information could perhaps be onerous or impossible. Now these initiatives serve as examples of what Howard Rhiengold (2002) defines as smart mobs, people conducting intelligent and efficient behavior through increasing network links. Martinez lists many initiatives that allow for today’s youth to participate in these smart mobs.

     It also speaks to the larger participatory culture that is a defining characteristic of today’s youth. Jenkins defines participatory culture as having the following characteristics:

  1. With relatively low barriers to artistic expression and civic engagement
  2. With strong support for creating and sharing one’s creations with others
  3. With some type of information mentorship whereby what is known by the most experienced is passed along to novices
  4. Where members believe that their contributions matter
  5. Where members feel some degree of social connection with one another (at the least they care what other people think about what they have created.


     As this participatory culture and the existence of smart mobs continue to be the way of learning, working and socializing it must be taken with a grain of salt. Perhaps this is because as we all become collaborators and creators, the level of information and the source of information is no longer comprised of the traditional sources of validation that are so much a part of our learning, at least how we once knew it. One key example of this is that a sorority funds Martinez’s article. Perhaps in traditional academics this would be a cause for concern, however if we see what Rhiengold and Jenkins use to characterize today’s innovative youth, they simply are vital members of our participatory culture.


Sources


Martinez, M. (2009). INNOVATION: Students as Smart Mobs, Phi


The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media   
     Education for the 21st Century [White paper]. Retrieved from


Additional sources of interest:
Friedman, T. (2009, February 14). Yes, They Could. So They Did. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/15/opinion/15friedman.html